A schematic overview of points of agreement between holistic
|
Holistic-spiritual paradigm |
Reductionist paradigm |
Comment |
|
Law of dynamic equilibrium (from material to spiritual worlds) |
Feedback/homeostasis |
Systemic approach applicable to both paradigms |
|
Law of cycles (on all levels, from elements to historic cycles) |
Cycles are accepted from a materialist point of view. From periodic revolutions of planets to biorithms. |
Many cycles are measurable. Additionally, statistical approach yields estimates of duration of cycles |
|
Hierarchical structure of universe Embeddedness. Small systems mirror larger structures. |
Hierarchies are recognized to some extent. Groups, sets and subgroups/sets are known in math, physics, chemistry, etc. Also, consider cells, tissue, organs, organisms as hierarchies. |
Structure, function, order are terms acceptable to scientists. Applicable to individual entities as well as complete systems of beings or ‘things’ |
|
Unique characteristic of each being (subtle pattern of vibration, archetype) |
Ditto, to a certain extent: gene pattern, personality pattern |
Applicable from genes to resonance phenomena and to larger systems of populations, stars, etc. Unique wavelength of mass-particles |
|
Progressive evolution. |
Very limited view (increase of complexity in Darwinian evolution) |
Considerable differences between esoteric point of view and scientific viewpoint. |
|
Duality is basis for manifestation. This goes far beyond simple good-evil schemes |
Fragmented view. Matter is energy. Wave/particle duality. Boson-fermion interaction. |
Duality is recognized in the form of polarities (proton-electron, ions in cells, antagonisms (muscles), etc. |
|
Unity in diversity. |
Intuited by great scientists |
From unified fields to the "Divine Mind" is really not a big step. Such fields are the effluxes from Divine Beings, according to the great philosophers of old |
Note: agreement is present to a considerable degree on the material level of existence. It has taken scientists centuries to arrive at the same conclusions as the old sages and philosophers, but scientists now must take a leap of faith to accept the holistic paradigm as more fit to explain the nature of man and the universe.
See my